A long while back I was reading an article about perfluorinated  compounds. Within that health-related post, they mentioned that  researchers from Denmark think that chemicals used (PFCs) to keep stuff  grease-free and stain-free could be predisposing children to metabolic  disorders later in life.
PFCs are everywhere, evidently, and are not limited to food packaging  like you find with microwave popcorn bags, etc. Here is a quote from the  page that I was recently reading: "...they keep your upholstered  furniture and carpets stain-repellant and water-repellant and your  drapes wrinkle-free. The chemicals serve the same function on  permanent-press clothing and any outerwear, backpacks or other  accessories that are advertised as water-repellent. While you'll wind up  eating PFCs that are used in food packaging, you'll most likely inhale  PFCs in all the other applications listed, since the chemicals bind to  dust floating around your home." Source = healthyliving.msn.com/pregnancy-parenting/kids-health/harmful-food-packaging-putting-kids-at-risk [link is no longer active]
On the other hand, after reading more about the recent study they  mentioned, it made me less sure if the perfluorinated compounds really  have any negative impact on human health. I mean, they were basically  using overweight kids to prove their point. Yet, within that study, they  plainly said that normal-weight kids that had high levels of PFCs in  their body didn't show any ill effects. WTF? In conclusion, they assume  that people who are already overweight would be more sensitive to these  supposedly dangerous PFCs. Once again, WTF? 
Now, what does seem to suck, is that it takes humans much longer to rid  their self of the PFCs than it would for animals out in the wild, lab  rats, etc. In fact, it takes several years for a typical humanoid to  flush their current PFCs out of their biological system that they often  refer to as a body. If you'd like to read more about that subject, go  here: www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/newscience/half-life-of-perfluorooctanesulfonate-perfluorohexanesulfonate-and-perfluorooctanoate-in-retired-fluorochemical-workers-olsen-et-al/
If you'd like to read another negative article about perfluorinated compounds, go here: pollutioninpeople.org/toxics/pfcs
Now, here is where the "do they really have any negative impact on human  health?" part of this post begins. What about the retired workers from  places that manufacture stuff that is loaded with PFCs? You'd think they  would have never lived to retirement age and/or would have all dropped  dead by now or had severe problems if these particular chemical  compounds were highly hazardous to human health, wouldn't ya say? Well,  apparently not, since many of them are totally healthy. Could this  latest PFC scare tactic all be a lie or simply some hyped-up hulajula  mawktooey hoopla and ballyhoo? Either way, feel free to go visit an  article about another study concerning this subject, except this one  says that PFCs have no negative impact on human health: solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en_US/PFOS/PFOA/Information/Health-Environment/ [link is no longer valid]
At any rate, I'm getting tired of these studies that are constantly picking on my damn microwave popcorn! LOL!
---End of Post "Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs) - Do they really have any negative impact on human health?"
Semi-related Post: Worried about Popcorn Lung?
Uncategories
Perfluorinated Compounds (PFCs) - Do they really have any negative impact on human health? 
الاشتراك في:
تعليقات الرسالة (Atom)
 

EmoticonEmoticon